New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/14/1982
State v. Snedeker
Citations
- 99 N.M. 286
- 657 P.2d 613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- warning against applying “loose logic and rubber-stamp reactions” to invalidate a search warrant on the basis of “any small item [that appears] to be wrong” in the affidavit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easley, Federici, Payne, Respectfully, Riordan, Sosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 264×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-27· cited 150×
- State v. RyonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 132×
- State v. DonaldsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-17· cited 99×
- State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 92×
- State v. CohenNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-12-09· cited 55×
- State v. BurdexNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-07-12· cited 46×
- State v. NyceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-05-22· cited 46×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-01-16· cited 38×
- State v. HaidleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-08-23· cited 34×
- State v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-01-22· cited 31×
- In Re Shon Daniel K.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-03-30· cited 29×
- State v. KnightNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-01-10· cited 24×
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-12-15· cited 24×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-10-27· cited 23×
- State v. WisdomNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-08-28· cited 18×
- State v. SansomNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-09-03· cited 14×
- State v. SimpsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-05-19· cited 13×
- State v. PenaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-05-31· cited 12×
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-05-14· cited 11×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1959-01-26· cited 3,191×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-07· cited 2,030×
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-12-11· cited 1,927×
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 910×
- United States v. Robert Leonard LucarzNinth Circuit· 1970-06-02· cited 181×
- United States v. Calvin D. RahnTenth Circuit· 1975-03-25· cited 121×
- Leonard Aron v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1967-09-26· cited 84×
- Edward William Porter v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-10-12· cited 72×
- State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-03-21· cited 68×
- United States v. Sheldon R. Teller and John D. SullivanSeventh Circuit· 1969-07-07· cited 65×
- United States v. Charles Albert MulliganNinth Circuit· 1973-11-09· cited 62×
- State v. BloomNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-03-10· cited 61×
- State v. LunaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1979-04-05· cited 52×
Other cases named State v. Snedeker
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- State v. SnedekerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-07-14· cited 2×
- State v. SnedekerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1880-02-15· cited 2×
- State v. SnedekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1970-10-02· cited 1×
- State v. SnedekerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2009-06-30
- State v. SnedekerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2009-06-30
- State v. SnedekerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-08-25
- State v. SnedekerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1862-06-15
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.