State v. Smoot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding claim not waived when defendant objected at trial to instruction because “the defendant did not testify that [the condition] interfered with his thinking” and in new trial motion added constitutional language
• finding claim not waived when defendant objected at trial to instruction because “the defendant did not testify that [the condition] interfered with his thinking” and in new trial motion added constitutional language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pointer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-09-20· cited 10×
• State v. Rollins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-08-02· cited 9×
• Christopher L. Carroll v. Dora B. Schriro, Director, Department of Corrections Jeremiah (Jay) W. Nixon, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-03-16· cited 8×
• State v. Fanning
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1994-02-08· cited 2×
• Christopher Carroll v. Dora Schriro
  Eighth Circuit· 2001-03-16

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Sandstrom v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
• Rose v. Clark
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
• Francis v. Franklin
  Supreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
• State v. Erwin
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1993-03-23· cited 100×
• State v. Stallings
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-05-28· cited 23×
• State v. Sollars
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-01-21· cited 2×