Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 9/4/2007
State v. Smoot
Citations
- 737 N.W.2d 849
- 2007 Minn. App. LEXIS 120
- 2007 WL 2472556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that felony DWI poses a special danger to human life 15 in the abstract
- holding that predicate offense need not include a specific mens rea element
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hudson, Lansing, Halbrooks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-17· cited 145×
- People v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-09-07· cited 114×
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 96×
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-01-05· cited 83×
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-03-15· cited 47×
- State v. NunnSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-09-26· cited 44×
- State v. StarfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-03-13· cited 33×
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-07-12· cited 32×
- State v. BransonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1992-08-07· cited 22×
- State v. HenningSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-31· cited 20×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-08-07· cited 19×
- State v. HorningSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-07-28· cited 15×
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-11-21· cited 14×
- State v. WeltzSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-04-06· cited 14×
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-03-29· cited 4×
- State v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-05-22· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.