State v. Smith
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2187
Syllabus
SENTENCING – JUDICIAL BIAS – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – EIGHTH AMENDMENT – CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: The trial court did not exhibit judicial bias in imposing sentence where the record does not reflect that the trial court's sentence was based on bias or prejudice. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 79 years' imprisonment where the sentence was not based on impermissible considerations, was not contrary to law, and did not violate the Eight Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WalkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-31· cited 5×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-05· cited 2×
- State v. SawyerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-31· cited 2×
- State v. PovedaOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-28· cited 1×
- State v. KrouseOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-02-09
- State v. CoppaOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-09
- Arnoff v. PattersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-04-06
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court· 2022-06-07· cited 205×
- State v. HairstonOhio Supreme Court· 2008-05-21· cited 182×
- State v. DeanOhio Supreme Court· 2010-10-26· cited 115×
- State v. BrunsonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 45×
- State v. GloverOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-07· cited 23×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-14· cited 8×
- State v. SharpOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.