Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 2187

Syllabus

SENTENCING – JUDICIAL BIAS – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – EIGHTH AMENDMENT – CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: The trial court did not exhibit judicial bias in imposing sentence where the record does not reflect that the trial court's sentence was based on bias or prejudice. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant to an aggregate term of 79 years' imprisonment where the sentence was not based on impermissible considerations, was not contrary to law, and did not violate the Eight Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.