Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/17/2023
State v. Smith
Citations
- 206 N.E.3d 138
- 2023 Ohio 126
Syllabus
CRIMINAL - Felony restitution R.C. 2929.18(A)(1) restitution must be an amount based on the victim's economic loss direct cause proximate cause receiving stolen property identity fraud consequential costs.
Judges: Eklund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-22· cited 727×
- Murphy v. Carrollton Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-08-28· cited 427×
- State v. LalainOhio Supreme Court· 2013-07-17· cited 102×
- State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. PlantsOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-26· cited 6×
- State v. MullinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. McNearOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 5×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-16· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.