Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/12/2002
State v. Smith
Citations
- 352 S.C. 133
- 572 S.E.2d 473
- 2002 S.C. App. LEXIS 179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the record devoid of any evidence, direct or circumstantial, tending to prove the co-defendants acted with the premeditated purpose and intent required to sustain a conviction and reversing Smith’s conviction for second-degree lynching
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Shuler, Stilwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-07-08· cited 2,433×
- State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-19· cited 100×
- State v. FennellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 94×
- State v. PinckneySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 61×
- State v. LollisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-29· cited 56×
- State v. BuckmonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-11-13· cited 44×
- Knox v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-04-24· cited 28×
- State v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-03-15· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.