Connecticut Appellate Court· 4/25/2000
State v. Smith
Citations
- 57 Conn. App. 478
- 749 A.2d 67
- 2000 Conn. App. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to afford review under Golding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-03-10· cited 19×
- State v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-15· cited 19×
- Daniels v. AlanderConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-01· cited 15×
- Pinto v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-27· cited 4×
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-03-11· cited 1×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 731×
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 641×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- Wheway v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-06-19· cited 51×
- State v. ReddickConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-12-28· cited 46×
- State v. CrumpConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-09-24· cited 27×
- Remick v. LopesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-05-19· cited 20×
- State v. DurkinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-07-23· cited 15×
- Smith v. LiburdiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-12-17· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.