Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/20/2022

State v. Smith

Citations

2022 Ohio 1291

Syllabus

NEW TRIAL: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion in denying, without a hearing, defendant's Crim.R. 33(A) motion for a new trial, when that motion was not timely filed, and leave under Crim.R. 33(B) to move for a new trial out of time was not sought.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Schiebel
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1975-07-09· cited 118×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-20· cited 10×
State v. Ojile
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-27· cited 5×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-27· cited 3×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-15· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.