Missouri Court of Appeals· 3/2/1982
State v. Smith
Citations
- 633 S.W.2d 412
- 1982 Mo. App. LEXIS 3543
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial counsel had not shown “due diligence in securing the attendance of the witness, or his testimony by deposition for a year before trial,” even though the testimony the absent witness was intended to impeach was known to counsel for about a year before trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ard, Dixon, Pritch, Pritchard, Shangler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CuckovichSupreme Court of Missouri· 1972-09-11· cited 165×
- State v. HoltSupreme Court of Missouri· 1980-01-15· cited 120×
- State v. Van HornSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-01-12· cited 47×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri· 1978-10-10· cited 37×
- State v. WynnSupreme Court of Missouri· 1965-05-10· cited 21×
- State v. BragerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1973-07-16· cited 12×
- State v. BradfordSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-02-09· cited 9×
- State v. DodsonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1973-02-12· cited 7×
- Kansas City v. StamperMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-10-06· cited 4×
- State v. MercerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1980-03-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.