Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2866

Syllabus

CONFRONTATION OF WITNESSES-INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL - Where Appellant was in an adjoining room and able to communicate with his counsel, he was given several chances to control his behavior, his interests were adequately represented by competent counsel, and Appellant failed to explain how his absence hampered his ability to defend, Appellant's voluntarily actions caused his removal and trial court did not err in ordering Appellant's removal from courtroom during evidentiary phase of trial and since operability of a firearm may be proven by circumstantial evidence, Appellant's counsel was not deficient for failing to object to trooper's lay testimony regarding operability.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.