Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/3/2021

State v. Smith

Citations

167 N.E.3d 587
2021 Ohio 291

Syllabus

TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARASSMENT – EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY: Defendant's conviction on one count of telecommunications harassment was not supported by sufficient evidence where the evidence did not establish that defendant's specific purpose in making the telecommunication was to threaten another.

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Fulton
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-31· cited 3×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
State v. Ellison
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2008-10-10· cited 30×
In re C.W.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-20· cited 9×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.