Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3454

Syllabus

Competency stipulation R.C. 2945.38 finding consecutive sentences agreed sentencing range R.C. 2953.08(D) authorized by law not reviewable. Where the parties stipulated to the expert's competency report and the court noted the parties' stipulation on the record and in the journal entry, the absence of the court's specific \finding\ of competence in the journal entry was not required. Smith's consecutive sentence was within the agreed sentencing range and authorized by law and therefore not reviewable under R.C. 2953.08(D)(1).

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.