Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/13/2020
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 494
Syllabus
Ineffective assistance of counsel final appealable order res judicata Crim.R. 33 motion for a new trial motion for leave newly discovered evidence. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a new trial and for revision of the judgment entry of conviction and sentence.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 645×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 500×
- State v. DuesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-27· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Jones v. AnstedOhio Supreme Court· 2012-01-19· cited 23×
- State v. TuckerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-18· cited 20×
- State ex rel. Cunningham v. LindemanOhio Supreme Court· 2010-09-22· cited 18×
- State v. BridgesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-13· cited 18×
- State v. GoldenOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-20· cited 14×
- State v. WilliamsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-23· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Carter v. SaffoldOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-17· cited 4×
- State v. FreemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.