State v. Smith

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 304

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's counsel filed a brief under the authority of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). A thorough review of the record reveals no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Judgment affirmed. The case is remanded to the trial court for the sole purpose of filing a nunc pro tunc judgment entry that incorporates the consecutive sentencing findings.