Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/3/2018
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4799
Syllabus
CRIMINAL LAW - identification procedure impermissibly suggestive and unnecessary Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, factors to assess whether identification was reliable under the totality of the circumstances suppression not required attempted murder, aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary convictions supported by sufficient evidence and weight of the evidence.
Judges: Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 2012-01-11· cited 846×
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 575×
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 493×
- State v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-28· cited 67×
- Saxton v. SheetsSixth Circuit· 2008-11-20· cited 55×
- State v. ShawOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-31· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.