Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/12/2018

State v. Smith

Citations

2018 Ohio 2271

Syllabus

Appellant's plea of guilty was not the result of improper inducements offered by the prosecution and was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. Appellant received effective assistance of trial counsel at the plea hearing and sentencing. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Sadler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
Boykin v. Alabama
Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
Brady v. United States
Supreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 7,191×
Michel v. Louisiana
Supreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
State v. Nero
Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
MacHibroda v. United States
Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,618×
State v. Engle
Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 784×
State v. Veney
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
State v. Hester
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
State v. Spates
Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-08-05· cited 321×
State v. Bowen
Ohio Supreme Court· 1977-10-26· cited 44×
State v. Armor
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-02· cited 6×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.