Supreme Court of North Carolina· 5/23/1905
State v. Smith.
Citations
- 50 S.E. 859
- 138 N.C. 700
- 1905 N.C. LEXIS 318
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “As the rule of privilege has a tendency to prevent the full disclosure of the truth, it should be limited to cases which are strictly within the principle of the policy that gave birth to it.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Phillips v. Dallas Carriers Corp.M.D. North Carolina· 1990-12-14· cited 13×
- State v. Red PaintNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-10-23· cited 11×
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.D. South Carolina· 1972-05-30· cited 7×
- State v. FarookSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2022-05-06
- Ford v. JurgensNorth Carolina Business Court· 2021-10-05
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.