State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a trial court acted without authority when it failed to follow CrR 7.8 procedures
• concluding that a trial court acted without authority when it failed to follow CrR 7.8 procedures
• “The superior court did not have authority to deny an untimely motion and, thus, we vacate the order and remand for the superior court to enter an order complying with [CrR 7.8] consistent with this opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lamb
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-09-13· cited 3×
• State Of Washington, V Kevin S. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-04-12
• State v. Flaherty
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-02-28
• John Garrett Smith v. J.C. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-02-22
• State v. Martinez
  Washington Supreme Court· 2024-01-18

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Castro v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,352×
• City of Seattle v. Klein
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 20×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-03-06· cited 12×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Bailey
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 12×
• In Re Personal Restraint Petition of Vazquez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-04· cited 8×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Vazquez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-09-04· cited 5×