Court of Appeals of Washington· 12/29/2009
State v. Smith
Citations
- 223 P.3d 1262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that all or nothing strategy was not a legitimate trial tactic where defense counsel did not present sufficient evidence to support acquittal
- holding that all or nothing strategy was not a legitimate trial tactic where defense counsel did not present sufficient evidence to support acquittal
- ineffective assistance warranted reversal where counsel failed to seek lesser included instruction on second degree animal cruelty
- ineffective assistance warranted reversal where counsel failed to seek lesser included instruction on second degree animal cruelty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Houghton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court· 1995-09-13· cited 2,396×
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court· 1996-05-09· cited 744×
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1978-09-07· cited 578×
- State v. Fernandez-MedinaWashington Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 306×
- State v. BowermanWashington Supreme Court· 1990-12-13· cited 121×
- State v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-06-19· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.