Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 979 S.W.2d 215
  • 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1989
  • 1998 WL 767436

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]hether the attorney-client privilege protects a particular communication ... must be determined on a case-to-case basis”
  • “[A] party may not claim the privilege where the dealing and communication between a non-lawyer and a lawyer concern non-legal matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shrum, Montgomery, Barney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.