State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under State “same-in-law-and-in-fact” test for double jeopardy, two offenses not the same when each requires proof of an element that the other does not
• under State “same-in-law-and-fact” test for double jeopardy, two offenses are not the same when each requires proof of an element that the other does not
• under State “same-in-law-and-fact” test for double jeopardy, two offenses not the same when each requires proof of an element that the other does not

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Petkus
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1970-09-08· cited 41×
• State v. Collis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-03-30· cited 30×
• State v. Gosselin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-02-28· cited 30×
• State v. Bailey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-04-11· cited 19×
• State v. Sayler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-12-13· cited 14×
• State v. Proulx
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1970-03-31· cited 12×
• State v. Constant
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-02-28· cited 11×
• State v. Elbert
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-07-09· cited 9×
• State v. Moses
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-10-03· cited 9×
• State v. Houtenbrink
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-04-01· cited 7×
• State v. Goodwin
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1976-01-31· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gavieres v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1911-04-03· cited 625×
• Morey v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-11-15· cited 479×
• Commonwealth v. DiStasio
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-05-27· cited 63×
• Commonwealth v. Wardell
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1880-01-07· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Cummings
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1930-11-25· cited 21×