Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 6 So. 3d 652
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1494
  • 2009 WL 565191

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the statement satisfied the constitutional requirements set forth in Miranda because it did not limit the time during which the defendant could exercise his right to counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt, Silberman, Larose

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.