Missouri Court of Appeals· 10/28/2004
State v. Smith
Citations
- 134 S.W.3d 35
- 2003 WL 21692700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering context in which passive command—“none shall be given”—was used when determining to whom it was directed
- use of passive voice in the refusal provision of implied consent law results in it not specifying who is prohibited from giving a test
- “The Missouri Implied Consent Law was enacted to codify the procedures under which a law enforcement officer could obtain bodily fluids for testing by consent without a search warrant.”
- implied consent statute allows police to obtain blood sample without warrant or express consent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kathianne Knaup Crane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. StoneWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 37×
- State v. CromerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-12-27· cited 24×
- State v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia· 2005-04-26· cited 21×
- Bender v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-08-31· cited 14×
- Metzner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-05-21· cited 14×
- State v. GeissDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-22· cited 11×
- Murphy v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-06-21· cited 10×
- State v. HowesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-11-16· cited 5×
- State v. YarbroughMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-01-26· cited 4×
- State v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-02-22· cited 4×
- Covert v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 2011-06-21· cited 2×
- People v. MirandaAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-01-19· cited 2×
- Robin L. Schmidt v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 2020-09-01
- Commonwealth v. BohigianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2020-11-13
- State of Iowa v. Colby Davis LaubSupreme Court of Iowa· 2024-02-09
- State of Iowa v. Jeffrey John FlynnSupreme Court of Iowa· 2024-11-15
- Joseph Evan Dunbar v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 2023-08-15
- Richard Hershey, Appellant, vs. The Curators of the University of Missouri, et al., Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals· 2025-07-15
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-03-23· cited 1,905×
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 760×
- Hinnah v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-06-25· cited 164×
- State v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri· 1982-08-31· cited 146×
- State v. RutterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-12-24· cited 62×
- Blydenburg v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri· 1967-03-13· cited 52×
- Cooper v. GammonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-02-25· cited 46×
- State v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-06-28· cited 25×
- Bezayiff v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-11-04· cited 24×
- Blanchard v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-01-12· cited 21×
- State v. SetterMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 15×
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1978-04-14· cited 13×
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-09-24· cited 11×
- State v. LeRetteMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-08-03· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Holterman v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-08· cited 11×
- State v. WaringMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-11-09· cited 10×
- State v. TriceMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-01-26· cited 10×
- State v. StottlemyreMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-04-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.