State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e find that the omissions by the trial court in instructing the jury on note-taking, as mandated by Note on Use 4 for MAI– CR 3d 302.01, were significant . . . such that the court committed plain error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Beck
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-07-26· cited 43×
• State v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-05-01· cited 17×
• State v. January
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2005-11-22· cited 16×
• State v. Neal
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-02-10· cited 3×
• STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. NAPOLEON EMANUEL
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2024-02-01
• State of Missouri v. Willie Oliver
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2022-10-04

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• State v. Deck
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1999-06-01· cited 141×
• State v. Cole
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2002-02-26· cited 112×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 2003-03-04· cited 74×
• State v. Dudley
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-04-10· cited 64×
• State v. Hibler
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-27· cited 42×
• State v. Carr
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2001-05-29· cited 42×
• State v. Roe
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-10-26· cited 31×
• State v. Bradshaw
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-08-01· cited 27×
• State v. Taylor
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-02-08· cited 23×
• State v. Barnaby
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2002-12-17· cited 12×
• State v. Houston
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2004-07-27· cited 10×