Supreme Court of Georgia· 7/13/1989
State v. Smith
Citations
- 381 S.E.2d 37
- 259 Ga. 352
- 1989 Ga. LEXIS 320
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district attorney’s name appeared on accusation and the indictments as to all charges
- DA’s name appeared on accusation and the indictments as to all charges
- “[T]he district attorney’s name on the accusation and the indictment is conclusive circumstantial evidence that the district attorney had actual knowledge of all the offenses arising from the same conduct and the pendency of both prosecutions but chose to proceed separately as to each.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarke, Marshall, Bell, Weltner, Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nicely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-07-28· cited 21×
- MAXWELL v. THE STATE (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-06-01· cited 10×
- The State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-09-21· cited 9×
- In the Interest of J. B. W.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-01-09· cited 7×
- MacK v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-04-06· cited 4×
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-28· cited 4×
- State v. SummersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-08-22
- Desmond Delamara Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-28
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.