Supreme Court of Georgia· 7/1/1980
State v. Smith
Citations
- 269 S.E.2d 21
- 246 Ga. 129
- 1980 Ga. LEXIS 988
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While possession alone is insufficient to establish a prima facie showing of authenticity, it should be recognized that possession, together with other 19 circumstances, may meet the burden [to show authenticity].” (citation and punctuation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Undercofler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arevalo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2002-07-11· cited 28×
- Meeker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1982-09-08· cited 22×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2006-05-08· cited 19×
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2024-05-29· cited 18×
- Weathers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-02-22· cited 16×
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-11-19· cited 13×
- Davis v. First Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-10-16· cited 11×
- Twiggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-27· cited 8×
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-10-15· cited 5×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-01-12· cited 3×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-10-23· cited 2×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-02-12· cited 2×
- Amey v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-06-21
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.