State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• under RCW 62A.3-401(a), an unsigned check is non-negotiable and lacking in legal effect
• discussing the rule of legal efficacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Warfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-08-18· cited 29×
• State v. Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-22· cited 12×
• State v. David
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-08-08· cited 10×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-09-09· cited 9×
• State v. Ring
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-15· cited 4×
• State Of Washington v. Stacy Ann Bradshaw
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2018-04-09· cited 2×
• State Of Washington v. Anthony J. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-05-27· cited 1×
• State Of Washington v. John Ring
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2015-12-15
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-04

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-01-06· cited 95×
• State v. Scoby
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-08-23· cited 34×
• State v. LaRue
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-07-12· cited 20×
• State v. Morse
  Washington Supreme Court· 1951-07-19· cited 20×
• State v. Simmons
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-10-12· cited 19×
• State v. Haislip
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-04-09· cited 13×