Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 651 P.2d 207
  • 97 Wash. 2d 856
  • 1982 Wash. LEXIS 1576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the judicial comment on ER 80l(d)(l) provided that \the rule 'conforms state law to federal practice\'
  • holding ER 801(d)(l)(i) permits admission of a trial witness’s prior inconsistent statement as substantive evidence when that statement was made as a written complaint (under oath subject to penalty of perjury
  • holding ER 801 801(d)(1)(i) permits admission of a trial witness's prior inconsistent statement as substantive evidence when that statement was made as a written complaint (under oath subject to penalty of perjury
  • holding ER 801(d)(l)(i) permits admission of a trial witness’s prior inconsistent statement as substantive evidence when that statement was made as a written complaint (under oath subject to penalty of perjury) to investigating police officers subject to reliability analysis
  • holding ER 801 801(d)(1)(i) permits admission of a trial witness's prior inconsistent statement as substantive evidence when that statement was made as a written complaint (under oath subject to penalty of perjury) to investigating police officers subject to reliability analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dimmick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.