State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• each constitutional rule of criminal procedure has “a distinct function, an individual history and precedent, and a separate impact on the administration of justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-05-04· cited 181×
• State v. Sardo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-12-19· cited 55×
• State v. Butrick
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-28· cited 41×
• State v. Hooper
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 27×
• State v. Stenrud
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-08-06· cited 22×
• State v. Espinosa-Gamez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 21×
• State v. Ray
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-02-24· cited 8×
• State v. Adams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-03-08· cited 5×
• State v. Dosztal
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 3×
• State Bar v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-10-20· cited 1×
• State v. Encinas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-10-25· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Boykin v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
• Johnson v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
• Linkletter v. Walker
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
• Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann
  Supreme Court· 1943-01-04· cited 2,192×
• Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. Shott
  Supreme Court· 1965-11-15· cited 740×
• Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott
  Supreme Court· 1966-01-19· cited 593×
• State v. Griswold
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-07-23· cited 75×
• State v. Crowley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-04· cited 39×
• Application of Billie
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-01-11· cited 20×
• State v. Little
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 12×