State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Obtaining property in return for a worthless check will always constitute theft because the more general theft element subsumes the more specific worthless check element.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Perrin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-18· cited 8×
• State v. Nuckolls
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-25· cited 6×
• State v. E.L.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28· cited 5×
• Rembowski v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-19· cited 1×
• State v. EL
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-28

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carawan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 474×
• State v. Saufley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-21· cited 19×