State v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4973
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in failing to dismiss a charge against appellant based on a speedy-trial violation. While appellant was incarcerated in federal prison, he failed to follow the statutory procedure to demand a trial within 180 days on his pending Ohio charge. Appellant's later-appointed counsel did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to raise the foregoing issue. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 641×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 278×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-10· cited 13×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-03· cited 7×
- State v. ReeceOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-20· cited 3×
- State v. HornsbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-17· cited 3×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-15· cited 2×
- State v. YeighOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-17· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.