Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2086

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for aggravated vehicular homicide, aggravated vehicular assault, and operating a vehicle while under the influence were based upon sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant did not attempt to introduce the victim-driver's toxicology report at trial, so there is no evidentiary ruling on this issue to consider on appeal. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert accident reconstruction testimony or in imposing maximum and consecutive sentences. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.