Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/21/2025
State v. Smith
Citations
- 340 Or. App. 636
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- not obviously improper for prosecutor to suggest that it was unlikely that a witness was lying because it “was grounded in the testimony that the jury heard”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hellman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. VanornumOregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
- State v. ChitwoodOregon Supreme Court· 2022-10-20· cited 196×
- State v. PerezOregon Supreme Court· 2025-05-01· cited 68×
- State v. SlayCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-03-06· cited 23×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-31· cited 18×
- State v. DumdeiCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-01-02· cited 13×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.