State v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1749
Syllabus
RECORD SEALING — EXPUNGEMENT — R.C. 2953.32(D)(1): The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's applications for record sealing and expungement when defendant's applications failed to meet all seven requirements of R.C. 2953.32(D)(1) where, although defendant's convictions were eligible for record sealing or expungement and the requisite amount of time had passed to allow for his applications to be considered, defendant failed to show that he had been rehabilitated to the satisfaction of the trial court where defendant showed no remorse for his crimes; one of the victims objected; the State objected; the statements made by the victim who objected bolstered the State's arguments; and the State's interest in maintaining the records outweighed defendant's interest in having his records sealed or expunged.
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. HamiltonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-06-26· cited 180×
- State v. Aguirre (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-22· cited 66×
- State v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court· 2013-10-22· cited 52×
- State v. R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-01· cited 18×
- State v. A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-10-28· cited 17×
- State v. SagerOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-18· cited 10×
- State v. OforiOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-03· cited 7×
- State v. DeweyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-29· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.