State v. Smith
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 990
Syllabus
The misinformation concerning appellant's post-release control in the plea form did not prejudice appellant and therefore does not warrant vacating his guilty plea to domestic violence. Because the trial court failed to give certain statutorily-required advisements about appellant's duty to enroll in the violent offender database, the portion of the trial court's judgment pertaining to that duty is reversed, and the matter is remanded for the trial court to comply with the statutory requirements. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-20· cited 69×
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-18· cited 32×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 26×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-18· cited 15×
- State v. HarwellOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-18· cited 8×
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-19· cited 7×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-28· cited 6×
- State v. HastingsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-02· cited 5×
- State v. BoulwareOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-12· cited 3×
- State v. LockardOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-16· cited 2×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.