Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/23/2024
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5986
Syllabus
Eighth Amendment; Cruel and Unusual Punishment; Resentencing Hearing; R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g). Defendant-appellant's sentence did not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The trial court did not err by conducting a limited resentencing.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. WeitbrechtOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-08· cited 150×
- State v. ChaffinOhio Supreme Court· 1972-04-26· cited 147×
- State v. Moore (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-22· cited 90×
- State v. BollarOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-09· cited 57×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 1991-04-24· cited 54×
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-10· cited 21×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-28· cited 17×
- State v. DarrOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-29· cited 10×
- State v. Goff (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-09-20· cited 8×
- State v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-12· cited 6×
- State v. MasseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-25· cited 4×
- State v. HagwoodOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-02· cited 2×
- State v. FleckensteinOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-04· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.