Skip to main content

State v. Smart

Citations

  • 907 S.W.2d 275
  • 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1624
  • 1995 WL 563936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “This failure to include the issues in his motion for new trial means that we can review them only as plain error . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Smart, Spinden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.