Missouri Court of Appeals· 9/26/1995
State v. Smart
Citations
- 907 S.W.2d 275
- 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1624
- 1995 WL 563936
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “This failure to include the issues in his motion for new trial means that we can review them only as plain error . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breckenridge, Smart, Spinden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-07-25· cited 277×
- Luleff v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1991-04-09· cited 243×
- State v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1988-06-14· cited 177×
- State v. NauckeSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-04-21· cited 54×
- State v. HollandSupreme Court of Missouri· 1983-06-30· cited 51×
- Breeding v. Dodson Trailer Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1984-11-20· cited 45×
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-09-15· cited 30×
- State v. CliffordMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-07-02· cited 22×
- State v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-09-14· cited 18×
- State v. RussellMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-03-22· cited 17×
- State v. BrasherMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-10-26· cited 17×
- Van Der Jagt v. SIB International Bancorp Inc.Supreme Court· 1992-11-02· cited 17×
- State v. HamiltonMissouri Court of Appeals· 1980-10-07· cited 13×
- State v. FogleMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-11-17· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.