Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 7/7/2021
State v. Smart
Syllabus
In this criminal appeal, Jon Smart appeals the trial court's sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole (LWOP) for an offense committed as a juvenile following a resentencing hearing pursuant to Aiken v. Byars. Smart argues the trial court erred in its consideration of the factors required by Miller v. Alabama and Byars. We affirm.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 2012-06-25· cited 6,816×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court· 2010-05-17· cited 3,477×
- Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 1,525×
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-10-13· cited 513×
- Jones v. MississippiSupreme Court· 2021-04-22· cited 377×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-06-26· cited 293×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-03-13· cited 177×
- Aiken v. ByarsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-11-12· cited 148×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-08-21· cited 38×
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-07-21· cited 36×
- State of Arizona v. valencia/healerArizona Supreme Court· 2016-12-23· cited 34×
- State v. SlocumbSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-04-03· cited 31×
- In re M.B.H.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-19· cited 26×
- State v. FinleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-07-17· cited 18×
- State v. SerretteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-12-04· cited 9×
- Smart v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-06-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.