State v. Sloan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that telephone harassment requires the specific intent to harass at the time the defendant initiates the call

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rivas
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-19· cited 22×
• United States v. Robert Waggy
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-09-05· cited 11×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Thomas
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 973×
• State v. J.P.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 558×
• State v. Kjorsvik
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 539×
• State v. Brown
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
• State v. Yates
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 217×
• State v. Hopper
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-01-07· cited 121×
• State v. Tvedt
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-03-03· cited 108×
• State v. Lilyblad
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-02-07· cited 54×
• State v. Tellez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-29· cited 35×