Skip to main content
· 10/6/1998

State v. Slette

Citations

  • 585 N.W.2d 407
  • 1998 Minn. App. LEXIS 1126
  • 1998 WL 685268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a suspected drunk driver’s request for an attorney during the ICA process is ambiguous, police are required to either clarify the request or vindicate the underlying right
  • when driver expresses interest in consulting with an attorney, officer must either vindicate underlying right or clarify driver’s request

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crippen, Klaphake, Shumaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.