Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/15/2022

State v. Skaggs

Citations

2022 Ohio 2822

Syllabus

Convictions were supported by sufficient evidence. Sentence imposed complied with statutory requirements. Defendant was not denied his right to allocution at resentencing. Defendant's counsel was not ineffective.

Judges: Willamowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Lockhart v. Fretwell
Supreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,956×
State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Lytle
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 1,190×
State v. Conway
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-06-21· cited 704×
State v. Sallie
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-05-13· cited 583×
State v. Hester
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-02-04· cited 344×
State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
United States v. Moriani
Supreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 279×
State v. Sullivan
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-11· cited 91×
State v. Walker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-20· cited 73×
State v. Hartman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-05-06· cited 57×
State v. Potts
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-29· cited 35×
State v. Proffitt
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-03· cited 9×
State v. Skaggs
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-12· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.