State v. Sirisun

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing dismissal based on child’s nonspecific testimony at preliminary hearing where no claim or indication defendant was misled or prejudiced and charged offense within statute of limitations (quoting Tapp v. State, 269 N.E.2d 367, 369 (Ind. 1971))
• reversing dismissal based on child’s nonspecific testimony at preliminary hearing where no claim or indication defendant was misled or prejudiced and charged offense within statute of limitations (quoting Tapp v. State, 269 N.E.2d 367, 369 (Ind. 1971))
• “A person should not be able to escape punishment for such a . . . crime because he has chosen to take carnal knowledge of an infant too young to testify clearly as to the time and details of such . . . activity.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).