Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/8/2012
State v. Sinclair
Citations
- 191 Vt. 489
- 2012 VT 47
- 49 A.3d 152
- 2012 WL 2052785
- 2012 Vt. LEXIS 40
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant “was eligible to file a PCR petition and thus precluded from seeking relief through coram nobis”
- “[U]nder the modern-day formulation ... coram nobis is broad enough to encompass not only errors of fact that affect the validity or regularity of legal proceedings, but also legal errors of a constitutional or fundamental proportion.” (internal quotations and citation omitted)
- “While coram nobis was originally sought by initiating a new proceeding through a writ, in the United States ‘proceeding by motion is the modern substitute.’” (quoting United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55, 67, 35 S.Ct. 16, 19, 59 L.Ed. 129 (1914))
- “[U]nder the modern-day formulation . . . coram nobis is broad enough to encompass not only errors of fact that affect the validity or regularity of legal proceedings, but also legal errors of a constitutional or fundamental proportion.” (internal quotations and citation omitted)
- “While coram nobis was originally sought by initiating a new proceeding through a writ, in the United States ‘proceeding by motion is the modern substitute.’” (quoting United States v. Mayer, 235 U.S. 55, 67, 35 S. Ct. 16, 19, 59 L. Ed. 129 (1914))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reiber, Dooley, Skoglund, Robinson, Kupersmith, Supr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Trujillo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2013-10-10· cited 40×
- State of West Virginia v. Orville M. HuttonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2015-06-16· cited 35×
- State v. Michael RosenfieldSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-02-26· cited 5×
- State v. Aaron CadySupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-06-22· cited 1×
- Salmon v. StateVermont Superior Court· 2015-07-15
- Lumumba v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court· 2022-02-23
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 522×
- United States v. MayerSupreme Court· 1914-11-16· cited 500×
- Sanders v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1882-11-15· cited 193×
- People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-03-16· cited 151×
- Skok v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-10-10· cited 75×
- Korematsu v. United StatesN.D. California· 1984-04-19· cited 51×
- In Re StewartSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-11-03· cited 45×
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont· 2002-08-28· cited 37×
- State v. LeClaireSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-01-24· cited 29×
- In Re LawsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-06-22· cited 24×
- United States v. Chester FolakSeventh Circuit· 1988-12-19· cited 22×
- Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1973-03-21· cited 22×
- State v. BlakesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-03-11· cited 12×
- Gregory v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-09-09· cited 9×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2005-06-14· cited 5×
- United States v. OrenW.D. Michigan· 1985-11-26· cited 4×
- Beardsley v. Gordon's administratorSupreme Court of Vermont· 1830-01-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.