State v. Sinchak

Citations

• 229 Conn. App. 38

Syllabus

The defendant filed a motion with this court to dismiss the state's appeal from the decision of the trial court granting the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence. The defendant claimed that the appeal, which was taken before he was resentenced, was not from a final judgment. This court granted the defendant's motion and subsequently issued its opinion. Held: This court dismissed the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the trial court's decision granting the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence was an interlocutory order and not an immediately appealable final judgment. Considered September 4—officially released November 5, 2024