Skip to main content
· 6/13/1989

State v. Simson

Citations

  • 775 P.2d 837
  • 308 Or. 102
  • 1989 Ore. LEXIS 144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • erroneous instruction that witness was defendant's accomplice, in context in which it was given, did not amount to directed verdict that defendant was guilty
  • purpose of corroboration requirement and accompanying accomplice instructions is to highlight fact that “criminals may falsely accuse others of their misdeeds in order to minimize their own culpability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.