Skip to main content

Citations

  • 909 S.W.2d 46
  • 1995 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that like enhancement factor (10), factor (16) may be applied where persons other than the victim are in the area subject to injury
  • holding that the factor (16) applies when persons other than the victim of the crime committed are in the realm of danger
  • holding that enhancer (10) was applicable to aggravated robbery where the defendant placed other potential victims at risk of inju ry
  • holding that like enhancement factor (10), factor (16) may be applied where persons other than the victim are in the area and subject to injury
  • holding that factor (16) “may be applied in situations where individuals other than the victim are in the area and are subject to injury”
  • concluding that enhancement factor (10) is appropriate when persons other than the victim are nearby and subject to injury from the defendant’s actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welles, Wade, Summers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

114 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.