Skip to main content

Citations

  • 355 A.2d 695
  • 140 N.J. Super. 164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversible error where jury was not instructed that alleged accomplice to attempted murder must possess the same intent as the murderer
  • improper prosecutor's comment that officer walked up to defendants, pointed them out and looked at them, but defendants did not return his stare or say he was lying
  • \It is clear in New Jersey that a defendant can be held as an aider or abettor only if he [or she] had the same criminal intent that must be possessed by the principal wrongdoer.\
  • where the charge fails to instruct the jury that the aider or abettor must possess the same intent as the perpetrator, it is reversibly defective since the jury must be told it \must find a community of purpose between the actual perpetrator and the aider and abettor\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Lynch, Larner and Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.