State v. Simpson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a second offense was “subsequent,” for purposes of HRS § 712-1200(4
• holding that a second offense was “subsequent,” for purposes of HRS § 712-1200(4), inasmuch as it was “ ‘subsequent,’ in terms of both commission and ascertainment of guilt,” notwithstanding that the two convictions had occurred simultaneously in the course of the same proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dudoit
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-04-26· cited 87×
• State v. Ramela
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-11-23· cited 19×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 58×
• State v. Akana
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1985-09-23· cited 43×
• State v. Tavares
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1981-07-07· cited 22×
• State v. Paaluhi
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 6×
• State v. Ahakuelo
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1984-06-19· cited 4×