State v. Simpson
Syllabus
This appeal presents the question of whether a hospital, by virtue of either the language in its admission contract or an alleged special relationship with its patients, owes a duty to ensure a doctor practicing at the hospital maintains malpractice insurance coverage. Because we hold under these specific facts that Laurens County Health Care System and its successor Greenville Health System (collectively, Hospital) had no such duty to Appellants in contract or tort, we affirm the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Hospital.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-12· cited 371×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-01-25· cited 76×
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 37×
- In re M.B.H.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-04-19· cited 26×
- Nelson v. OzmintSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-11-22· cited 15×
- Hayes v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-07-29· cited 13×
- McClam v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-11-19· cited 3×
- Interest of Kaundra C.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-05-30· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.