State v. Simone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because this appeal presents both a question of law and a mixed question of law and fact, our standard of review is de novo.”
• “Normally, the expression of one thing in a statute implies the exclusion of another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Knickerbocker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-07-29· cited 17×
• Samuel Rogers v. Joseph Rogers
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2019-02-01· cited 14×
• State v. Hancock
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-10-16· cited 13×
• State v. McMillan
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-05-29· cited 12×
• Greenland Conservation Commission v. New Hampshire Wetlands Council
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-12-19· cited 8×
• In re Juvenile 2004-789-A
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-04-07· cited 7×
• State of New Hampshire v. Ernesto Rivera
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2022-11-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hull
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-07-21· cited 45×
• Silva v. Botsch
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-09-10· cited 41×
• Woodstock Soapstone Co. v. Carleton
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-01-28· cited 27×
• Monahan-Fortin Properties, LLC v. Town of Hudson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-24· cited 23×
• St. Joseph Hospital v. Rizzo
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-05-13· cited 17×
• State v. Foss
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-08-16· cited 9×
• State v. Sprague
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-24· cited 6×